|
|
||||||
![]() |
||||||
|
Column by Byron A. Boyd, Jr.
Column by James M. Brunkenhoefer
Feedback
Retirement bill moving This is good news to more than 50,000 widows and widowers who are counting on increased pension payments. It's good news to all newer employees who will be vested in the retirement system after only five years of service. It is good news to thousands of veteran railroad employees who can choose to retire at age 60, with 30 years of service. It's also good that, after H.R. 4844 passed the House in a landslide, both the BLE and BMWE decided to support the retirement bill in the Senate. In return, the 11 original members of the coalition, any one of which could have vetoed BLE or BMWE participation, decided to include those brotherhoods' members in expanded health and welfare benefits for early retirees. They didn't have to because the health benefits were negotiated with the railroads outside of the retirement legislation. But they did. You see, when it comes to doing what is right for all railroad employees, the original 11 unions in the Rail Labor Coalition members did what was right.
UTU gets L&DRR on track Remember how the BLE went into a rant about a year ago when the 16 employees of the Louisiana & Delta Railroad asked the UTU to represent them? Seemed the brothers at the L&DRR had lost patience after the BLE hadn't gotten them a contract after allegedly representing them for seven years. In fact, they didn't even remember that the BLE was supposed to represent them because they hadn't done anything. Well, the BLE (as usual) said the UTU raided them (even though the BLE was shutout at the L&DRR in an NMB representation election) and filed another complaint with the AFL-CIO. So, what else is new? Well, now the employees at the L&DRR have a solid contract. The UTU did what the workers asked us to do, and we did them right. Isn't that what representation is all about? What does the AFL-CIO think about that? |
||||||
|
What's your opinion?
Feedback / UTU News |
||||||